Posted on 08 February 2011
Tags: agencies, analytical report, approval, Arizona, attorney, back, Bills, Borrow, borrower, capital, cash, collection, Collection agencyCollection agency, collectors, companies, Consumer, CreditCredit, debit, debit collectors, Debt, Debt cards, debt collection, Debt collection organization, debt collectors, debt repayment, Debt warrants, DebtDebt, debtor, debtors, Debtors' prisonDebtors' prison, debts, default, defaulter, disapproval, expenses, financing, Illinois, Importance, imprisonment, information, involvement, ISA, lates, law, law imposition, law strengthening organizations, Law_Crime, lease, liquidation, loan, malicious act, Michael Kinkley, Minneapolis, minneapolis star tribune, Money, owing money, police, police officers, repay, Resources, SPOKANE, state information, states, taxpayer, the Star Tribune, transportation, united states, unpaid bill, us debt, warrant, Warrants, WarrantWarrant (of Payment)
To send the money defaulters in the jail has been unlawful in United States since the nineteenth century. It is not only a malicious act to put these individuals behind the bars for not paying the money, but it is also of no use for recovering the cash; because the people in the jail will not be able to enhance their income, as they are unable to work.
Debt Warrants
Though owing money is not an offense, but the main debt collecting organizations all over the USA have devised a method in term of debt warrants to sort it out. In a normal debt collection system, the one who collects the debit obtain court verdict to compel the felonious borrower for paying back. If this decree is not fulfilled by the debtor, then the court may issue a disapproval reference or warrant to debtor.
Report by Minneapolis Star Tribune
As per latest analytical report by the Minneapolis Star Tribune, some of the debt collectors seek police help if the decree is not obeyed.
Statement of Michael Kinkley
In this regard an attorney in Spokane, Washington D.C with the name of Michael Kinkley has stated that the law strengthening organizations have inadvertently helped the debit collectors. He also states that the system is being exploited by the debt collects and they are also frightening the individuals involved.
Read the full story
Posted on 01 May 2009
Tags: America, Atlanta, attorney, bank, Bank of Canada, Bank of England, banking, Bill Drexler, Bill Still, Board of Governors, Britain, Chatto Ltd., CHICAGO, Committee on Banking and Currency, create money, creating money by lending, creation of money, Credit Manager, Currency, depression, dollar deception, Ellen Brown, energy sources, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Federal Reserve System, fedral reserve notes, Franklin Roosevelt, G. Edward Griffin, Government Printing Office, government printing press, Graham Towers, House of Representatives, how banks create money, How money is created, Illinois, Irving Fisher, issuance of money, James Robertson, Jerome Daly, John Bunzl, John Williams, Josiah Stamp, Martin Mahoney, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Morgan, Patrick Carmack, private banking, Public Information Center, reserve banking, Robert B. Anderson, Robert H. Hemphill, Secretary of the Treasury, Texas, The Bank President, U.S. government, united states, University of Texas, Victoria Times
The creation of money is called most astounding sleight of hand ever invented. The creation of money is now privatized, as it is now being hold by a private banking cartel instead of congress. Most people think that government is the authority behind the issuance of money, but actually this is not the case. Except of the coins, the banks create all money, not the government. Federal Reserve Notes are issued by a private banking cooperation named the Federal Reserve, and lent to the government. Moreover Federal Reserve Notes and coins together compose less then 3% of the money supply. The other 97% is created by the commercial banks as loans. 
This seems unbelievable that banks create money, they lend. Same was the feeling of jury in Landmark Minnesota case, until they heard the evidence. First national bank of Montgomery vs. Daly (1969) was a courtroom drama worthy of a movie script. Defendant Jerome Daly opposed the bank’s foreclosure on his $14,000 home mortgage loan on the ground that there was no consideration for the loan. Daly, an attorney representing himself, argued that the bank had put up no real money for his loan. Associate Justice Bill Drexler recorded the courtroom proceedings; he said his role was to keep order in the courtroom. Drexler had not given much mental acceptance for defense and watching this The Bank President Mr. Morgan took a stand and admitted that the banks routinely created money for loans and that this was standard banking practice. Presiding Justice Martin Mahoney and the jurors all agreed that it seems like a fraud.
Read the full story
